Method and apparatus for controlling lesion size in catheter-based ablation treatment

ABSTRACT

A method and apparatus that utilizes a force-time integral for real time estimation of lesion size in catheter-based ablation systems. The apparatus measures the force exerted by a contact ablation probe on a target tissue and integrates the force over an energization time of the ablation probe. The force-time integral can be calculated and utilized to provide an estimated lesion size (depth, volume and/or area) in real time. The force-time integral may also account for variations in the power delivered to the target tissue in real time to provide an improved estimation of the lesion size. In one embodiment, the force metric can be used as feedback to establish a desired power level delivered to the probe to prevent steam popping.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/160,108, filed Jan. 21, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,237,920, which is adivisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,762, filed May 10,2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,641,705, which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 61/176,519, filed May 8, 2009, ofU.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/176,853, filed May 8, 2009,and of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/177,180, filed on Jun.10, 2009, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by referenceherein in their entirety except for definitions defined therein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention relates generally to the treatment of organictissues using ablation therapy, and more specifically to the predictionand display of lesion sizes using catheter-based contact ablationdelivery systems.

BACKGROUND

There are many known conditions that affect the electrical impulses thatdrive the normal operation of the heart. Atrial fibrillation is onecommon cardiac arrhythmia involving the two bupper chambers (atria) ofthe heart. In atrial fibrillation, disorganized electrical impulses thatoriginate in the atria and pulmonary veins overwhelm the normalelectrical impulses generated by the sinoatrial node, leading toconduction of irregular impulses to the ventricles that generate theheartbeat. Atrial fibrillation can result in poor contraction of theatria that can cause blood to recirculate in the atria and form clots.Thus, individuals with atrial fibrillation have a significantlyincreased risk of stroke. Atrial fibrillation can also lead tocongestive heart failure or, in extreme cases, death.

Common treatments for atrial fibrillation include medications orsynchronized electrical cardioversion that convert atrial fibrillationto a normal heart rhythm. Surgical-based therapies have also beendeveloped for individuals who are unresponsive to or suffer serious sideeffects from more conventional treatments. The surgical techniquesinclude making incisions in the right and left atria to blockpropagation of the abnormal electrical impulse around theatrial-chamber.

U.S. Patent Application No. 2005/0256522 to Francischelli et al.(Francischelli) discloses a surgical-based technique for creating linearlesions along the heart wall by making an incision and inserting a jawof a dual jawedablation head into the heart and clamping a selectedportion of the heart wall between the jaws. The jaws are used to measurethe thickness of the heart wall tissue. A known clamping force isapplied to the jaws, from which a strain on the heart wall tissue can beinferred. Based on the thickness of the heart wall, a combination of jawforce, RF energy and ablation time is selected to fully ablate theclamped tissue. The strain imposed by the jaws is also used to infer thetransmurality of the lesion.

Catheter-based contact ablation techniques have evolved as a minimallyinvasive alternative to surgical-based techniques, and also as analternative for individuals who are unresponsive to or suffer seriousside effects from more conventional treatments (e.g., medications).Contact ablation techniques involve the ablation of groups of cells nearthe pulmonary veins where atrial fibrillation is believed to originate,or the creation of extensive lesions to break down the electricalpathways from the pulmonary veins located on the posterior wall of theleft atrium. Methods of energy delivery include radiofrequency,microwave, cryothermy, laser, and high intensity ultrasound. Thecontacting probe is placed into the heart via a catheter that entersveins in the groin or neck and is routed to the heart, thus negating theneed for an incision in the heart wall from the outside. The probe isthen placed in contact with the posterior wall of the left atrium andenergized to locally ablate the tissue and electrically isolate thepulmonary veins from the left atrium. Where complete the electricalisolation is desired, the process is repeated to form a continuous lineof ablated tissue between the left atrium and the pulmonary veins.

The advantages of contact ablation techniques have been recognized;there is no open body and thus risks of infection and recuperation timeare reduced. Further, utilizing the aforementioned techniques oftenreduce or remove the need of pacing hardware or other forms ofelectronic or mechanical therapy.

However, a concern with some contact ablation techniques is a phenomenonknown as “steam pop.” Steam pops are a risk associated particularly withirrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation, wherein subsurface heatingcauses rapid vaporization and expansion that disrupts the proximatetissue and is accompanied by an audible popping sound. If the disruptionis of sufficient magnitude (i.e. the volume of the vaporizing expansionlarge enough), cardiac perforations can lead to “tamponade,” whereinblood accumulates in the space between the myocardium (the muscle of theheart) and the pericardium (the outer covering sac of the heart, causingcompression of the heart.

One study concludes that maintaining catheter tip temperatures below 45°C. will prevent steam popping during RF energy delivery. See Watanabe,et al., “Cooled-Tip Ablation Results in Increased Radiofrequency PowerDelivery and Lesion Size in the Canine Heart: Importance of Catheter-TipTemperature Monitoring for Prevention of Popping and Impedance Rise,”Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.9-16 (2002). By contrast, another study determined that that steam popsare not related to the temperature of the contacting ablation head, butinstead are a strong function of the decrease in target tissueimpedance, and recommends monitoring the impedance so that it does notdecrease more than a predetermined amount. See Seiler et al., “Steampops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: Feasibility of impedancemonitoring for prevention,” Heart Rhythm, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1411-16(2008).

A drawback of impedance-based measurement to establish good ablationcontact is that the organ wall may not have a uniform behavior. Fatareas have very different impedance than muscle areas. The differencesmake the impedance reading an unreliable indicia of contact integrity.In addition, safety may be compromised because the attending physicianmay exert a greater contact force to obtain a better impedanceindication while not having the benefit of knowing the contact force.

Another study has concluded that steam popping can be avoided by properselection of power level/lesion diameter combinations. See Topp et al.,“Saline-linked surface radiofrequency ablation: Factors affecting steampopping and depth of injury in the pig liver,” Ann. Surg., vol. 239, no.4, pp. 518-27 (2004). U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2008/0097220 to Lieber et al. discloses a method of detecting subsurfacesteam formation by measuring the tissue reflection spectralcharacteristics during ablation.

Another concern with contact ablation techniques is whether the lesionsize is sufficient to accomplish the electrical isolation. At the sametime, excessive ablation is also problematic. Excessive ablation cancause damage to the tissues of other organs proximate the heart (e.g.the esophagus), and can also damage the structural integrity of theatrium and lead to “breakthrough,” wherein blood leaks through theatrium wall. Techniques to control lesion size during contact ablationprocedures include: an impedance measurement between the contactingprobe and ground through the target tissue (WO 2008/063195, US2008/0275440); monitoring the current output of intervening tissues(serving as an electrolyte) during RF ablation for an inflection thatoccurs before the onset of harmful tissue charring (U.S. Pat. No.6,322,558); the use of external auxiliary electrodes to increase lesiondepth (U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,964); a microwave probe to heat sub-surfacetissue in combination with cryogenic contact cooling of the surfacetissue to extend lesion depth without harming surface tissue (U.S. Pat.No. 7,465,300); measuring the temperature of the lesion immediatelyafter energy delivery (US 2008/0275440). Several patents disclosemethods for cooling and/or monitoring the temperature of the tip of anRF ablation probe to prevent overheating of the probe tip and theattendant buildup of coagulant that interferes with RF transmission,thereby enhancing lesion depth (US 2005/0177151, US 2007/0093806, US2008/0161793).

Despite advances in the control of lesion size and steam popping, theeffectiveness and risks associated with catheter-based ablation can behighly variable. See Calkins et al., “HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert ConsensusStatement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation:recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. Areport of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter andsurgical ablation of atrial fibrillation”. Heart Rhythm, v.4, no. 6, pp.816-61 (2007). Calkins notes that the results of catheter ablation arewidely variable, due in part to differences in technique and to theexperience and technical proficiency of the administering physician.

Catheter-based ablation techniques also present challenges relating tovisualization of the procedures and providing the operator indicationsof success, problem areas or potential complications. Early methods forvisualization of ablation techniques include mapping the heart cavityutilizing catheter endocardial mapping (U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,064) whichrelies on the analysis of electric signals. These early methods provedunreliable and more advanced methods were developed to increase theaccuracy of the cavity modeling. More recent methods of visualizationutilize a Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)scan to first model the patient's body cavity at high resolutionsfollowed by a “fusion” with system that establishes a relationshipbetween the 3-dimensional image and physical coordinates. Certainsystems utilize a catheter position sensor to create a morphologic mapof the organ. Other systems utilize a catheter position sensor that mapsthe image coordinates of the CT/MRI scan with the sensed physical organregions in the patient. Some of these systems utilize position sensorsbased on electrical signals while other systems utilize electromagneticsignals. Still other systems utilize ultrasound arrays to determinelocation in creating an accurate map of the heart cavity. Commercialmapping implementations are available including the Biosense CARTO®mapping system which utilizes magnetic field sensors and a specializedcatheter to detect chamber geometry and EnSite NavX™ Navigation andVisualization Technology which utilizes electrical sensors and astandard catheter to generate 3D models. Still other methods utilizeX-Ray machines mated with image fusion technologies such as XMR togenerate a 3D visualization of the heart cavity.

A method with rapidly increasing interest is the 3D angiography whichutilizes a contrast medium that is injected into the heart cavity. Afterinjection, fluoroscopy equipment rotates around the patient capturinginformation. Based on the captured information, a computer system isable to construct a 3D rendering of the heart cavity. Recent advances inMRI technologies including Delayed-enhancement Magnetic ResonanceImaging (DE-MRI) techniques have been developed that are providingincreased resolution images of the heart cavity without spatialdistortion. Other recently developed 3D mapping techniques have beenpublished by Pappone et al., “Non-fluoroscopic mapping as a guide foratrial ablation: current status and expectations for the future”,European Heart Journal Supplements, vol. 9, Supplement I, pp. 1136-1147(2007), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety exceptfor express definitions defined therein.

However, while 3D visualization techniques have advanced, they are onlyone component in the analysis of ablation procedures. Traditionally,ablation procedures have been characterized by measuring the power,temperature and/or time of the RF energy being applied. These initialcharacterizations proved unsuccessful in predicting overall lesion sizeand effectiveness. Thus, existing technology merely provides theoperator with a limited amount of visual information related to theirablation procedure. Existing visualizations may provide the operatorwith an estimate of power, temperature and time by color codingfixed-size 3D objects overlaid onto a 3D virtualization of the heartcavity. However, there is no technology available that is able toprovide an operator with a comprehensive visualization andcharacterization of the ablation procedure outcome.

Alternative apparatuses and methods for predicting the size of lesionsand/or reducing the incidence of injurious steam pops duringcatheter-based contact ablation procedures, as well as for visualizingthe predicted lesion sizes, tissue damage (i.e. perforations andresistive tissues) and isolation gaps during contact ablation procedureswould be welcome.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Various embodiments of the invention reliably predict the volume, areaand/or depth of lesions created through the use of a force-timeintegration technique. Other embodiments control the energy delivered tothe ablation probe based on the contact force between the ablation probeand the target tissue to prevent steam popping.

In another aspect, various embodiments of the invention reliablyvisualize the predicted volume, area and/or depth of lesions createdduring ablation procedures. One embodiment visualizes the predictedlesions created utilizing a force contact density mapping procedure.

Another embodiment visualizes the predicted lesions through the use of aforce-time integration technique. Yet another embodiment visualizes thepredicted lesions through the use of a force-time and power (and/orcurrent) integration technique. Other embodiments predict the occurrenceand locations tissue damage such as perforation that occurred during theablation process. Still other embodiments predict the occurrence andlocation of isolation gaps that may occur during or after the procedure.

Recent advances in catheter-based contact ablation systems have includedthe ability to measure a reactive force on a catheter that results fromcontact with the target tissue. A number of patent applications haverecently disclosed apparatuses and methods for determining the contactforce or stress measurement at the distal tip when in contact with thetarget tissue. See, e.g., EP 2047797, WO 2008/045958, WO 2007/050960.These disclosures introduce contact force and/or contact pressure asanother real-time metric that is available to the practitioner duringcontact ablation procedures, in addition to time, temperature, powerand/or current). U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0200049,2007/0060847, 2008/0294144 to Leo et al. and 2008/0009750 to Aeby etal., assigned to the assignee of the present application and thedisclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in theirentirety except for express definitions therein, disclose devices andmethods for resolving a force vector in three-dimensional space for areactive force on the end effector of a catheter, including an RFablation head.

It has been found that integrating the reactive force over the time ofcontact at a known energization level can provide reliable estimates ofthe size of the resulting lesion. Alternatively, the product of theforce and energization level, which can both vary with time, can beintegrated over the time of contact. Reliable approximations to theforce-time or force-energization-time integrals may also be produced byknowing the time of contact and multiplying by an average or otherrepresentative value of the force and/or energization over the timeinterval. Herein, a “force-time integral” is broadly defined as ameasured quantity that involves the measurement of force over time.Accordingly, a “force-time integral” as used herein includes force-timeproducts (e.g. a representative force multiplied by the time interval ofapplication), force-energization-time integrals, force-time-energizationproducts, and combinations thereof.

Studies regarding the relationship between the contact force and lesionsize, as well as contact force and lesion size have been published byYokoyama et al., “Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in IrrigatedRadiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence ofSteam Pop and Thrombus,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology,vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 354-362 (December 2008), which is hereby incorporatedby reference in its entirety except for express definitions definedtherein. Yokoyama also discloses the optimization of RF power andapplication time to maximize lesion formulation and reduce steam pop andthrombosus. Yokoyama, however, does not disclose a nexus between aforce-time integrals and lesion size prediction.

Herein, an apparatus and method is disclosed for further reducing theincidence of steam pop. Structurally, the apparatus and method utilize acontact force or contact pressure measurement as a feedback element tothe power source controlling the delivery of energy to the ablationhead. The power level is controlled for higher output when there are lowor intermittent contact forces/pressures, and for lower output whenthere is higher contact forces/pressure. By this technique, steampopping can be reduced.

In some embodiments, an apparatus and method is provided forcomprehensively characterizing the results of ablation operationutilizing visualization technology. The visualization aspect can providethe operator with reliable indications of lesion characteristics (e.g.area, volume and/or depth) of the lesions created during ablationprocedure, in real time and/or for post-operative analysis. In certainembodiments, contact density is mapped to a three-dimensional (3D)visualization of the heart cavity during the ablation procedure. Inother embodiments, force, time and an ablation energization parameter(e.g. power or current) are mapped to a 3D visualization of the heartcavity during the ablation procedure. The visualization aspects of theinvention may enable the professional to increase the efficiency of theablation procedure by making reliable approximations of lesion size andassessing the completeness of isolation lines. In still otherembodiments contact, force and power density is mapped to a 3Dvisualization of the heart cavity. The visualization aspects may enablethe operator to make reliable approximations of potential tissue damagesuch as perforation prone areas which may produce complications inpatient recovery. The visualization aspects may further enable theoperator to make reliable approximations of potential isolation gapsthat are present during the procedure or may occur in a certain periodafter the procedure.

The visualization aspects can further provide the operator with theability to differentiate between lesions created by each surgicalprocedure, thus providing information as to overall coverage and patienthistory. Thus, information relating to ablation procedures may be storedfor further analysis or to become part of the patient's medical history.Finally, some embodiments of the invention may provide information as tothe creation of edemas or other cell structures that negatively affectthe penetration of RF power during the ablation process. These edemas orstructures may be then monitored or targeted for future ablationprocedures. By utilizing the described methods and apparatus, thecharacteristics of lesions created during the ablation process can bepredicted reliably, ensuring procedure success and potentially reducingprocedure complications and recovery time.

The methods and apparatuses disclosed herein are also adaptable torobotic control of contact and/or lesion size. Calculation of theforce-time integral can be performed by a microprocessor that alsocontrols (or provides information to another microprocessor thatcontrols) the manipulation of the catheter. The calculation can beperformed in real time or pseudo-real time so that either the poweroutput (or voltage or current output) or the contact force or contactpressure is actively controlled by the system to produce the predictedlesion size, without human intervention in the control of the force-timeintegral.

Structurally, various embodiments of a system for ablating a targettissue during a medical procedure comprise an elongate flexible catheteradapted to be introduced into a patient during the medical procedure,the catheter including a distal portion. An ablation head is disposed atthe distal portion of the catheter, the ablation head adapted to contactthe target tissue during the medical procedure. A force sensor isoperatively coupled with the ablation head and adapted to detect acontact force exerted on the ablation head from contact with the targettissue, the force sensor outputting a signal in response to the contactforce. In one embodiment, the force sensor includes a fiber optic straingauge. A power source is operatively coupled with the ablation head forenergization of the ablation head. A current sensor may be configured todetect the electrical current to the ablation head.

In one embodiment, a control system is adapted to receive the signalfrom the force sensor to produce a sequence of contact force values. Thedata acquisition system can also be adapted to determine a time periodof energization of the ablation head and for integration of the sequenceof contact force values acquired over the time period of energization toproduce a force-time integral.

In one embodiment, the control system is adapted to determine anenergization parameter to be delivered to the ablation head and topredict a size parameter of a lesion on the target tissue created by theenergization parameter. The prediction in this embodiment is based onthe force-time integral and the energization parameter. In oneembodiment, the energization parameter is power level and/or electricalcurrent. The control system can be adapted to determine the magnitude ofthe electrical current delivered to the ablation head, and be furtheradapted to predict a size parameter of a lesion on the target tissuecreated by the magnitude of current, the prediction being based on theforce-time integral and the magnitude of current. The size parameter canbe one or more of lesion volume, lesion depth or lesion area.

The control system can also be adapted to control the time period ofenergization of the ablation head, as well as the magnitude of anenergization parameter delivered to the ablation head with the powersource. In one embodiment, the control system is adapted to control themagnitude of an energization parameter delivered to the ablation headwith the power source, the magnitude of the energization parameter beingbased on the magnitude of the contact force. The control system can beadapted to substantially disable energization of the ablation head withthe power source when the force-time integral reaches a predeterminedvalue. In still other embodiments, the control system can be adapted toincrease irrigation, in addition or in place of decreasing or disablingenergization. The control system in certain embodiments can beconfigured to calculate the force-time interval in real time.

The overall system can be configured for manual operation by a humanoperator, or coupled to a robotic manipulator for movement of the distalportion of the catheter. The robotic manipulator can be controlled bythe control system.

In certain embodiments, the control system includes a central processoroperatively coupled to the force sensor and the power source. A storagemedium can be provided that contains programming instructions to beaccessed and carried out by the central processor. In one embodiment,the programming instructions include measuring a sequence of contactforces with the force sensor while the ablation head is in contact withthe target tissue, the sequence of contact forces being in reaction tothe contact; energizing the ablation head for a period of time while thesequence of contact forces is being measured; and integrating thesequence of contact forces that were measured with the force sensor overthe period of time of energizing the ablation head to determine aforce-time integral. The programming instructions can further includedetermining an energization parameter delivered to the ablation headduring the energizing of the ablation head, controlling the magnitude ofthe energization parameter, selecting the energization parameter basedon the contact forces of the sequence of contact forces to prevent orreduce the incidence of steam pop. determining a size parameter of alesion based on the force-time integral and the energization parameter,and/or instructions to terminate energization of the ablation head whenthe force-time integral reaches a predetermined value.

A force signal conditioning system can also be adapted to digitize thesignal received from the force sensor and to provide the digitizedsignal to the central processor. For configurations utilizing a fiberoptic force sensor, the force signal conditioning system can include afiber optic interrogator operatively coupled with the fiber optic straingauge and the central processor. The force signal conditioning systemcan also be adapted for the production of the sequence of contact forcevalues (for example, to digitize the signal received from the forcesensor and to provide the digitized signal to the central processor).

Methodologically, various embodiments of the invention include exertingthe ablation head of the catheter against the target tissue, measuring asequence of contact forces with the force sensor while the ablation headis exerted against the target tissue, the contact forces being inreaction to the exerting of the ablation head against the target tissue.The ablation head is then energized for a period of time while thesequence of contact forces is being measured. The sequence of contactforces measured with the force sensor over the period of time ofenergizing are then integrated to determine a force-time integral. Inone embodiment, the method further involves determining an energizationparameter delivered to the ablation head during the energizing of theablation head, and determining the size parameter of the lesion based onthe force-time integral and the energization parameter. The magnitude ofthe energization parameter can be selected based on the contact forcesof the sequence of contact forces to prevent or reduce the incidence ofsteam pop.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a schematic of a contact ablation system in an embodimentof the invention;

FIG. 2 depicts a test set up for determining the effects of constant orperiodic force on lesion size in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is an example time trace of a substantially constant sequence offorces generated by the test set up of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is an example time trace of a variable sequence of forcesgenerated by the test set up of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is an example time trace of an intermittent sequence of forcesgenerated by the test set up of FIG. 2;

FIG. 6 is a sectional view of a test specimen after ablation in the testset up of FIG. 2;

FIG. 7 is a graph of lesion volumes vs. force-time integral value at 20-and 40-watts in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 is a graph of lesion depth vs. force-time integral value at 20-and 40-watts in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 9 is a graph of lesion area vs. force-time integral value at 20-and 40-watts in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 10 depicts a schematic of a contact ablation system m an embodimentof the invention;

FIG. 10A depicts a schematic of programming instructions in anembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 11 is an enlarged partial sectional view of an atrium wall duringlesion generation in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 12 is a time trace of contact forces generated in vivo by a forcegenerating probe in an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 13 depicts a schematic view of a computer system in an embodimentof the invention;

FIG. 14 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ in an embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 15 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with visual depictions oflesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 16 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with alternate visualdepictions of lesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 17 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with alternate visualdepictions of lesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 18 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with alternate visualdepictions of lesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 19 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with visual depictions oflesions created by contact density mapping in an embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 20 depicts an alternate 3D virtual model of an organ with visualdepictions of lesions created by contact density mapping in anembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 21 depicts a 3D virtual model of an organ with visual depictions oflesions created by force contact density mapping in an embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 22 depicts an alternate 3D virtual model of an organ with visualdepictions of lesions created by force contact density mapping in anembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 23 is a cross sectional view of an organ wall with visualdepictions of lesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 24 depicts a computer system interface for displaying the visualdepictions of lesions in an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 25 depicts a flow chart of the steps for generating and displayinglesions on a 3D model of an organ according to one embodiment of theinvention; and

FIG. 26 depicts a flow chart of the steps for generating and displayingedema or resistive tissue on a 3D model of an organ according to oneembodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a contact ablation system 30 is depicted in anembodiment of the invention. The contact ablation system 30 includes acatheter 32 having a distal portion 34 comprising an ablation head 36operatively coupled with a force sensor 38, the ablation head 36arranged for contact with a target tissue 40. The catheter 32 isoperatively coupled with a power source 42 that provides and measuresthe delivered energy to the ablation head 36. A measurement device 44 isalso depicted, capable of sourcing the force sensor 38 and measuring anoutput signal from the force sensor 38.

In operation, the ablation head 36 is brought into contact with thetarget tissue 40 and energized to create a lesion 46 on and within thetarget tissue 40. The force sensor 38 is configured to generate anoutput from which a magnitude of the contact force can be inferred.Generally, the contact force is time-variant, particularly when thetarget tissue 40 is subject to motion (e.g., the wall of a beatingheart). The energy flow (e.g., current or power) through the ablationhead 36 can also be time variant, as the energy flow may depend on thecontact resistance between the ablation head 36 and the target tissue40, which in turn can vary with the contact force and the changingproperties of the lesion 46 during ablation.

Various embodiments of the invention implement a force-time integralfrom which the size of the lesion 46 (volume, depth and/or area) can bepredicted. A “force-time integral” is broadly defined herein as ameasured quantity that involves the measurement of force over time. Theforce-time integral can be defined one of several ways, all involvingthe measurement of force over time. One example of a force-time integralis, of course, the numerical integration of the force over time (FOT):FOT=∫F(t)dt  Eqn. (1)where F(t) is the contact force measured over time between a targettissue and a distal portion of an ablation head. The parameter tdesignates time, indicating that the contact force can be time variant.

The force-time integral can also be expressed a force-time product(FTP), given byFTP= F·Δt  Eqn. (2)where F is a representative value of F(t) over a time period Δt.

Another expression of a force-time integral comprises aforce-energization over time (FEOT) integral or aforce-energization-time product (FETP), given respectively asFEOT=∫F(t)E(t)dt  Eqn. (3)FETP= F·Ē·Δt  Eqn. (4)where E(t) is the measured energization indicative of the energy flowdelivered to the ablation head (e.g., power or electrical current) and Ēis a representative value of the measured energization E(t) over thetime period Δt (for example a time-averaged energization value). Themeasured energization E(t) can also be time-variant, as noted above. Theforce-time-energization product (FETP) can include combinations of theabove parameters, for example:FETP=Ē∫F(t)dt  Eqn. (5)FETP= F∫E(t)dt  Eqn. (6)In another embodiment, a normalized force over time (NFOT) integrationthat is normalized with respect to the energization levels can also beimplemented:

$\begin{matrix}{{N\mspace{14mu}{FOT}} = {{\frac{\int{{F(t)}{E(t)}d\; t}}{\int{{E(t)}d\; t}} \cdot \Delta}\; t}} & {{Eqn}.\mspace{14mu}(7)}\end{matrix}$Such an approach may be useful for enhanced accuracy where only FOT orFTP calibrations are available.

It is further noted that with respect to the present invention themeasurement of “force” per se is not necessary to infer or derive aforce-time integral. Although force and strain or pressure may not beequivalent in other contexts, other parameters that have a relationshipwith force (e.g., strain, pressure) can be substituted for the forcecomponent of the force-time integral in the present invention and stillreliably predict lesion size. Likewise, it is understood that otherreferences to “force” herein (including, but not limited to, forcesensor, force signal, force conversion, force set point, force interval,force values, force measurement, force level, force limits, contactforce and reaction force) are intended to be broadly construed toinclude other parameters such as pressure and strain that have arelationship with force.

The various force-time integrals defined above can be useful inpredicting the size of the lesion 38 that is created thereby. Methodsand apparatuses for obtaining lesion size information and for utilizingthis information in lesion creation and size prediction is discussedbelow.

Referring to FIG. 2, a test apparatus 50 was developed to determine therelationship between contact force-time integration and RF ablationlesion size in an embodiment of the invention. A motorized platform 52was used to raise and lower a tissue specimen 54 (bovine muscle) underan irrigated ablation catheter 56 (2.3-mm diameter) fixed in space andhaving an ablation head 57 oriented substantially perpendicular to thetissue specimen 54. The ablation head 57 of the irrigated ablationcatheter 56 was operatively coupled to a force sensor 58 (sensitivity<1g, 64 Hz sampling rate). The force sensor 58 was incorporated as afeedback element into a programmable closed loop controller 60 tocontrol a vertical displacement 62 of the motorized platform 52 toobtain desired contact force characteristics. The ablation head 57 wasoperatively coupled to a RF source 64, which was used to deliverunipolar RF energy to tissue specimen.

The set up was used to test three different contact conditions: constantCC, variable VC and intermittent IC. The constant contact condition CCsimulated a constant contact force during the ablation period. Thevariable contact condition VC simulated continuous contact, but withforces varying in a periodic fashion to simulate the interaction of anablation probe with a beating heart. The intermittent contact conditionIC simulated periodic, non-continuous contact to simulate interaction ofan ablation probe with a beating heart when contact is not continuous.

The experiment was conducted at constant power delivery levels of 20-and 40-watts. The time of energization was set at 60-sec., withirrigation of 17-cc/min of saline solution. The constant contactcondition CC was tested at 20-grams force (gmf), where 1-gmf isequivalent to the weight of 1-gram of mass at standard gravity. Thevariable contact condition VC was tested with a periodically varyingforce between approximately 10-gmf minimum and 20-gmf maximum. Theintermittent contact condition IC varied from 0-gmf minimum to 20-gmfmaximum, with the 0-gmf condition maintained for a portion of the dutycycle. The V and I contact conditions were tested at simulatedheartbeats of 50 and 100 beats per minute. Systolic-to-diastolic ratiosof 50:50 and 30:70 were also simulated.

Referring to FIGS. 3 through 5, example traces from the various contactconditions CC, VC and IC are presented in an embodiment of theinvention. Fourteen lesions were created for the constant contactcondition CC, 48 lesions for the variable contact condition VC and 35lesions for the intermittent contact condition IC. The force-timeintegrals were highest for the constant contact condition CC,intermediate for the variable contact condition VC and lowest for theintermittent contact condition IC. Lesion depth and volume were greaterfor the constant contact condition CC than for the intermittent contactcondition IC, and also greater for the variable contact condition VCthan for the intermittent contact condition IC.

Referring to FIG. 6, a depiction of the determination of the size (area,depth and volume) of a lesion 80 in the ablated tissue specimen 54 ispresented in an embodiment of the invention. The lesion 80 ischaracterized as having a surface area 82 and a volume 84. The surfacearea 82 and volume 84 of the lesion 80 is determined by first measuringthe diameter of the lesion, as determined by the border betweendiscolored and non-discolored tissue. For lesion surfaces having anelliptical shape, a major diameter A and a minor diameter B is measured.The ablated tissue is then dissected through a central axis 86 of thelesion 80. Where the lesion surface is elliptical in shape, thedissection is made along either the major or minor diameter A or B. Thedepth D of the lesion 80 is measured on the dissected tissue specimen54.

The surface area of the lesion may be determined byArea=π·(A/2)·(B/2)  Eqn. (8)

The volume of the lesion may be estimated as half the volume of anellipsoid:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{Volume} = {\frac{1}{2} \cdot \lbrack {{( \frac{4}{3} \}{\pi \cdot ( {A/2} )}} - {( {B/2} ) \cdot D}} \rbrack}} \\{= {{\pi/6} \cdot A \cdot B \cdot D}}\end{matrix} & {{Eqn}.\mspace{14mu}(9)}\end{matrix}$

Referring to FIGS. 7 through 9, the results of the integration of theforce-time integrals versus lesion volume, depth and area acquiredduring the test are presented in an embodiment of the invention. Asubstantially linear correlation exists between the force-time integraland both the lesion volume and the lesion depth for both the 20- and40-watt power delivery. No discernable relationship was found betweenlesion size and simulated heart rate or between lesion size and thesystolic:diastolic ratio.

Accordingly, in one embodiment, a method of predicting lesion size inaccordance with the invention is to establish the force-time integral(e.g. by integration or by the product of representative values aspresented in Eqns. (1)-(7)) from the force signal over the time ofenergization of the ablation head and to infer a lesion sizecharacteristic (e.g. depth, volume or area) from the integral via alinear correlation. This method can be made reliable to within a knownuncertainty by acquiring a sufficient population of data points toenable statistical treatment of the data. It is noted that theestimation of area of the lesion (FIG. 9) can readily be converted to anequivalent diameter De:De ²=4·A/π  Eqn. (10)

Referring to FIG. 10, a force sensing catheter-based contact ablationsystem 120 is depicted in an embodiment of the invention. The system 120comprises a force sensing catheter assembly 122 operatively coupled to adata acquisition and processing unit or control system 124, a powersource 126 and an infusion pump 128. The catheter assembly 122 mayinclude a handle portion 132 operatively coupled with an elongate,flexible catheter 134 having a proximal portion 136 and a distal portion138. The distal portion 138 includes a force sensor 142 operativelycoupled with a contact ablation probe or ablation head 144 and adaptedto output a signal in response to a contact force exerted on theablation head 144. The ablation head 144 may comprise one or moreelectrodes operatively coupled to the power source 126 via a power cable146. The ablation head 144 may also include one or more temperaturesensors 150. Signals from the force sensor 142 and temperature sensor150 (when present) may be routed to the control system 124 viainstrumentation cabling 152. The catheter assembly 122 may also includea digital memory device 154 for storage of calibration parametersspecific to the force sensor 142 and coupled to the control system 124via a computer cable 156.

The control system 124 may include an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter160, a force conversion module or force signal conditioning system 162and a central controller or processor 164, all of which may beoperatively coupled to an interface 166. The interface 166 may includeconnection for the various cabling 146, 152, 156 from the force sensingcatheter assembly 122, and may also be operatively coupled to a tare orzero reset 68 for zeroing the force sensor 142. The central processor164 may include or have access to a storage medium 168 that containsprogramming instructions 170 to be carried out by the central processor164. The central processor 164 may also control and log data from theforce signal conditioning system 162, and may also communicate with theA/D converter 160 via a communications cable 172, such as a RS-422cable. In one embodiment, the power source may be equipped with anoutput controller 173 operatively coupled to the central processor 164via a control line 174 for computer control of the power output. Thecentral processor 164 may also provide real time information via one ormore displays 176. A non-limiting example of the rate at whichinformation is logged by the central processor 164 is approximately60-Hz. A non-limiting example of the rate at which the displays areupdated is approximately 10-Hz.

Force sensing can be achieved with strain sensors ordistance/displacement sensors that sense the movement of a deformablebody. Strain sensors include common resistive strain sensors,piezoelectric and piezoresistive elements and MEMS sensors. Distancesensors include capacitive, inductive and optical sensor technologies.For example, certain distance sensors utilize a single magnetic emitteropposite three pickup coils to measure the local intensity changes ateach coil and therefore the strain on the body.

Generally, the force signal conditioning system 162 comprises equipmentfor driving or sourcing the sensing element or elements of the forcesensor 142 and/or digitizing or monitoring an output of the force sensor142. For example, if the force sensor 142 implements foil-type straingauges in a Wheatstone bridge configuration, the force signalconditioning system 162 may include an excitation source, a signalconditioner for conditioning and amplification of the output of theWheatstone bridge, and an A/D converter (not depicted). The force signalconditioning system 162 may also include firmware that converts thedigitized output into engineering units (e.g. newtons, pounds-force orgrams-force). Alternatively, the digital signal may be converted toengineering units by the central processor 164.

In one embodiment, the force sensor 142 comprises one or more fiberoptic strain elements, such as fiber Bragg grating(s) or Fabry-Perotresonator(s). In this embodiment, the instrumentation cabling 152includes fiber optic cables and the force signal conditioning system 162comprises a fiber optic interrogator, such as the MicronOptics model isSM125 (for fiber Bragg grating interrogation) and the FISO model FCM(for Fabry-Perot interrogation).

A current detector 180 may be operatively coupled with the power cable146 for detection of the electrical current flowing to the ablation head144. The current detector 180 may be operatively coupled to the A/Dconverter 160 for processing by the central processor 164. In oneembodiment, the current detector 180 comprises a conductive coilsurrounding the power cable 146 which produces an output signal 182proportional to the magnetic field generated by the AC current passingthrough the power cable 146.

In one embodiment, a robotic manipulator 184 can be operatively coupledto the force sensing catheter assembly 122. The robotic manipulator 184may be operatively coupled to a local microprocessor controller 186. Thelocal microprocessor controller 186 can be controlled by a user from alocal interface 187, and/or from the central processor 164.Alternatively, control of the robotic manipulator 184 may be provided bythe central processor 164 directly, which may eliminate the need for aseparate microprocessor controller and attendant interface.

Functionally, the robotic manipulator 184 can be made to respond to thecommands of the local microprocessor controller 186 to control themovement of the catheter 134 and the magnitude of any subsequentreaction force exerted on the ablation head 144. The movement may be thecontrolled parameter in a closed loop control scheme, and the forcemeasured by the force sensor 142 the feedback measurement. A desiredforce set point or desired force interval set point may be provided tothe local microprocessor controller 186 by an operator via the localinterface 187 or via the central processor 164.

Optionally, the desired force or force interval may be calculated from adeterminative parameter provided by the operator or by the controlsystem 124. For example, consider an application where a lesion sizehaving a volume of 300 cubic millimeters is desired at an energizationof 30 Watts. From FIG. 7, a force time integral of approximately 1000gmf-sec provides the determinative parameter from which the desiredforce or force interval is derived. The robotic manipulator 184 can thenbe activated to apply the desired force or force interval that, inconjunction with the time of energization of the ablation head 144,produces the force-time integral. The force applied by the roboticmanipulator 184 may be controlled by the local microprocessor controller186 at the desired force or within the desired force integral, while theforce values and energization time are monitored by the control system124 until the stipulated force-time integral is achieved. The processmay be terminated by the control system 124 by shutting off the power tothe ablation head 144.

Referring to FIG. 10A, an example of the programming instructions 170 isdepicted in an embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, aminimum desired size and desired energization are initially establishedat steps 170 a and 170 b, respectively, for example by user input. Theablation head is then brought into contact with the target tissue (step170 c), for example by sending commands to the robotic manipulator 184.The magnitude of the contact force between the target tissue and theablation head is measured at 170 d and compared with a predeterminedacceptable magnitude interval at step 170 e (e.g., the desired forceinterval 198 of FIG. 11). If the contact force is not within anacceptable magnitude interval, the position of the ablation head isadjusted to increase or decrease the magnitude of the contact force(step 170 f) and the magnitude of contact force re-measured by repeatingstep 170 d. The loop of steps 170 f, 170 d and 170 e and is repeateduntil the measured contact force between the target tissue and theablation head fall within the acceptable magnitude interval at step 170e. The programming instructions 170 then instruct the central processor164 to energize the ablation head 144, for example by control of the RFgenerator 126 via the output controller 173, at a desired level ofenergization at step 170 g (e.g., establishing a set point forelectrical current or power).

Once the ablation head is energized, the embodiment depicted at FIG. 10Athen goes into a loop comprising steps 170 h, 170 i, 170 j and 170 k.Within the loop, the magnitude of the contact force and the level ofenergization is measured at step 170 h, and a force-time integral (e.g.,any one of Eqns. (1) through (7)) is then computed based on the forcemagnitude measurement acquired at step 170 h since energization of theablation head at step 170 f. A prediction of the lesion size based onthe force-time interval computed at step 170 i is then made (step 170j), and a comparison with the desired lesion size made at step 170 k. Ifthe predicted lesion size is greater than or equal to the desired lesionsize, the loop at steps 170 h through 170 k is terminated; otherwise,steps 170 h, 170 i, 170 j and 170 k are repeated. Once the loop at steps170 h through 170 k is terminated, the energization of the ablation headis also terminated (step 170 l) and the final lesion size prediction isrecorded (step 170 m) in computer memory.

Referring to FIG. 11, operation of the entry of the catheter 134 into apatient can be made via a vein in the neck or groin of a patient androute the catheter 134 through the vein to the heart 188 of the patient.The distal portion 138 of the catheter 134 can be caused to enter anatrium 190 of the heart 188 and the ablation head 144 brought intocontact with the wall of the atrium 190. Adequate contact between theablation head 144 and the wall of the atrium 190 causes the controlsystem 124 to register a meaningful force measurement originating fromthe force sensor 142 and posting the result on the display 176 in realtime. The use of a plurality of displays enables the force informationto be presented at several locations, for example in the operating roomfor the benefit of the operator and in a control room (often separatefrom the operating room) for the benefit of an assistant.

The operator then adjusts the position of the distal portion 138 of thecatheter 134 until a desired level of force is posted on the display176. Upon reaching the desired force level, the operator may thenenergize the ablation head 144 for a desired time period, creating alesion on the atrium wall. The operator may repeat the process at otherlocations to create a desired pattern of lesions on the atrium wall,such as depicted in FIG. 11.

Referring to FIG. 12, a time trace 194 of forces 196 registered by thecontrol system 124 are depicted in an embodiment of the invention, withan example and non-limiting indication of a desired force interval 198.The depiction of the time trace 194 may be displayed real time on thedisplays 176. The forces 196 will typically be of an undulating naturedue to the systolic and diastolic movement of the heart 188. The datapresented on the displays 176 may be in the form of an instantaneousnumeric value, a time-averaged numeric value of a number of data points,a time trace of the time averaged numeric values, or some combinationthereof. The presentation of the data on the displays 176 may betailored to inform the operator when the forces 196 are within thedesired force interval 198, such as by identification of upper and lowerforce limits 198 a and 198 b on the time trace 194 or by presenting anindication when a time-averaged value has remained within a desiredinterval for a period of time.

The control system 124 can be adapted to integrate the force-timeparameters while acquiring and displaying data. The central processor164 may be configured to start the integration of the force-timeintegral when the operator initiates power to the ablation head 144 andto shut off the power from the power source 126 when the force-timeintegral reaches a predetermined value. In one embodiment, thepredetermined value may be based on the area or zone of the heart to beablated, recognizing that not all tissues of the heart respond the sameto contact ablation. The predetermined value may also or instead bebased on the lesion size desired by the operator, using a correlationsuch as provided in FIGS. 7 through 9 that establishes the force-timeintegration value corresponding to the desired lesion size. Such dynamiccomputation of the force-time integral may provide more reliableresults. All the operator need do is initiate the power; the centralprocessor 164 determines when to shut off the power based on theforce-time integral.

In one embodiment of the invention, the central processor 164 may beprogrammed to control an energization parameter (e.g., power or current)delivered to the ablation head 144 based on the force sensed by theforce sensor 142. The central processor 164 can monitor the forceresolved by the force signal conditioning system 162 and determine adesired energization magnitude that corresponds to the resolved force.The central processor 164 may then control the output (e.g., amperes orwatts) of the power source 126 using the power controller 173.

The control of the power source 126 may be open loop or closed loop. Inan open loop configuration, the power source 126 may be calibrated sothat the setting of the power source 126 (e.g., voltage or current)produces a known output (e.g., current or power) to within an acceptableuncertainty. In a closed loop configuration, the output signal 182 ofthe current sensor 180 may be utilized to provide the feedbackparameter. The output signal 182 of the current sensor 180 may beconditioned to temper the unsteadiness of the current caused, forexample, by intermittent contact. The determination of power or currentlevel desired for a nominal contact force may be accomplished by amathematical function or a lookup table stored in the memory of thecentral processor 164. In one embodiment, the controlled current levelmay be greater than 0.2 amps. In another embodiment, energy delivery maybe tailored so that the current level does not exceed 2 amps.

Functionally, controlling the magnitude of the energization parameterbased on the contact force can prevent or reduce the incidence of steampop. The force vs. energization relationship may be tailored to thispurpose. The power prescribed for a given force could be chosen so thatthe chances of steam pop is reduced, and/or so that any steam pop thatdoes occur is not severe enough to cause cardiac perforations.

It is further noted that time variation in the magnitude of theenergization parameter doesn't preclude the use of the force-timeintegration technique. While the calibrations of FIGS. 7 through 9 weremade at constant power levels of 20- and 40-watts, the linearrelationship between the force-time integral variable and the lesionsize suggests that linear interpolation or extrapolation between the twofunctions should be reliable. Therefore, calibration data such asprovided in FIGS. 7 and 8 can be manipulated to provide lesion size as afunction of both force-time integral and the ablation power.

It is noted that while the data presented herein (i.e. lesion size vs.force-time integral and power) can form the basis of linearinterpolations, the invention is not limited to linear interpolation ofthese parameters. For example, additional functions at otherenergization parameter levels (e.g., 25-, 30- and/or 35-watts) couldprovide the basis of a higher order interpolation between energizationparameter levels.

In an alternative embodiment, the control system 124 may instead measurethe energization parameter of the power source 126 to establish thedesired force level for the operator to target based thereupon. Thedesired, power-adjusted force level may be displayed on the displays(s)176 numerically, as an interval on a time trace, or both.

In another embodiment, estimates of the lesion size may be based on thetime spent in a given contact condition (CC, VC or IC) For example, aforce measurement could be made once during the contact condition andassumed constant throughout the contact interval. Determination of thecontact time could be made another way (e.g., with an EKG) andmultiplied by the force to arrive at a force-time integral value of lowresolution. Such a method would require only a limited number ofmeasurements and lower the time resolution requirements of the forcemeasurements.

Referring to FIG. 13, the central processor 164 in one embodiment of thecatheter-based contact ablation system 120 may connect to a HospitalInformation System (HIS) 200. The HIS 200 may contain severalapplication servers 202 and database system 204 in which medical recordsand medical operations data is stored and executed. Thus, in thisembodiment, the central processor 164 may communicate informationrelating to the characterization and visualization of the lesions in theablation procedure to the HIS 200 in order to make the information partof the medical record history. In various embodiments, thecharacterization and visualization of lesion information may be laterviewed utilizing a variety of computing devices such as handheldportable devices 206 laptop or nettop computers 208 and desktopworkstations 210. A person having skill in the art will recognize thatthe characterization and visualization of lesion information may beviewed on any device utilizing viewing functions either implemented inhardware or computer executable software.

Referring to FIG. 14, a 3D virtual model of an organ is presentedaccording to one embodiment of the invention. In these embodiments, the3D virtual model is a virtual model of a patient's heart 260. Asmentioned earlier a high-resolution 3D model of the heart 260 may becreated utilizing a variety of procedures including Magnetic ResonanceImaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT). The MRI or CT scan in thenmapped or fused to a system of geographic coordinates. Thus, followingthe mapping procedure, the operator has a high resolution 3D virtualmodel 260 of a patient's heart. The 3D virtual model 260 may becommunicated and stored in the HIS 200 and become part of the patient'smedical record.

In certain embodiments the 3D virtual model 260 is used in conjunctionwith location-aware force sensing catheters to generatelocation-sensitive characterizations and visualization of lesions. Invarious embodiments force sensing catheters utilize magnetic sensors orelectrical sensors to estimate the position of the catheter within theheart cavity. For example, electrode patches placed on the patient mayinterface with a force sensing EP catheter to track location of thecatheter within the patient's heart. This position may then be mapped tothe 3D virtual model 260 to provide real-time or near real-time catheterposition information to the operator.

Referring to FIGS. 15 through 18 the characterization and visualizationof lesions according to various embodiments of the invention arepresented. In various embodiments, the operator, during an ablationprocedure will guide the force sensing catheter 134 to a location ofinterest. The distal portion 138 of the catheter 134 may be caused toenter an atrium of the heart. The contact ablation probe 144 may bebrought into contact with the wall of the atrium, causing the dataacquisition and processing unit 124 to register a meaningful forcemeasurement originating from the force sensor 142 and displayed on thedisplay 176 in real time. The operator then adjusts the position of thedistal portion 138 of the catheter 134 until a desired level of force isposted on the display 176. Upon reaching the desired force level, theoperator may then energize the contact ablation probe 144 for a desiredtime period, creating a lesion on the atrium wall. The operator mayrepeat the process at other locations to create a desired pattern oflesions on the atrium wall. In various embodiments, the level of force,temperature, and time period of applied energy is recorded by the dataacquisition and processing unit 124.

While the data acquisition and processing unit 124 is acquiring anddisplaying data, the system may also be compiling, characterizing andproducing visualization information. The central processor 164 may beconfigured to compile, characterize and visualize lesion informationduring each iteration of an operator's initiation of power to thecontact ablation probe 144. The central processor 164 may then overlaythe computed lesion information on the 3D virtual model 260.

In various embodiments data acquisition and processing unit 124characterizes and visualizes lesions generated during an ablationprocedure. In various embodiments the data acquisition and processingunit 124 may utilize information related to metrics such as contact,touch force, power, temperature, electrical impedance, force-timeintegral or any combination thereof to characterize and visualize lesioninformation. Further, the data acquisition and processing unit 124 canestimate the area, depth and volume of affected tissue at each ablationsite and apply a different visualization depicting these estimates.

In some embodiments the data acquisition and processing unit 124utilizes magnitudes to further characterize lesion coverage. Forinstance, in various embodiments, the data acquisition and processingunit 124 overlays the estimated lesion characteristics of on the 3Dvirtual model 260 utilizing a high magnitude 280, a medium magnitude 282and a low magnitude 284 of a metric such as force, time, temperature,power, electrical impedance or force-time integral. Specifically, oneembodiment characterizes lesions created utilizing high force (over 20g), medium force (between 10 g and 20 g) and low force (below 10 g) asthe high, medium and low magnitudes 280, 282, 284, respectively. Invarious embodiments, each magnitude level has a different visualization,such as varying area, color, stroke, opacity or fill pattern todifferentiate between the lesions at each threshold level, at eachlocation. Further, the visualization may represent each lesion by itsown defined area 290 or visual effect 292 or may merge the borders ofeach lesion location to provide views of overall coverage and magnitudelevel as depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6. In other embodiments thevisualization may represent each metric magnitude level using a separatevisual effect. For instance, in certain embodiments the magnitude offorce-time integral may be represented by area while the magnitude oftemperature is represented by a color. One having skill in the art willappreciate that the differentiation of metrics into magnitudes is notlimited by the present disclosure. Thus, in certain embodiments, metricsare organized into fewer than three magnitudes while in otherembodiments metrics are organized into at least three magnitudes.Further, one having skill in the art will appreciate that in variousembodiments the delineation of metrics into magnitudes may be alteredutilizing a system setup or preferences operation that allows for thealteration of metric delineation.

In various embodiments, the visualization may be altered to conform toresults of further pathological analysis of lesions at each magnitudelevel. For instance, in certain embodiments the visualizations of highmagnitude 280 and medium magnitude 282 may be ovals having varyingaspect ratios (ratios of major diameter to minor diameter) to betterreflect the physical manifestation of the lesion in the patient's hearttissue. In this way, the operator is provided with an estimate of lesionarea and coverage in a patient's heart. Additionally, in variousembodiments, the data acquisition and processing unit 124 may providethe operator a visual history of the procedure such as a time-lapsevisualization of the procedure for making decisions regarding furtherlesion sites or for implications on patient care.

In one embodiment the force-time integral is utilized to overlay avisualization, such as a dot, of the predicted lesion size. In thisembodiment, the magnitude of force or the magnitude of timeproportionally affects the diameter of the visualized dot. In anotherembodiment, the force, time and power integral is utilized to predictthe lesion size. In various embodiments a color code is used to mark theestimated lesion size. For example, yellow for a small lesion and redfor a large lesion. In yet another embodiment, the diameter of avisualized dot represents the estimated lesion area and the color of thevisualized dot represents the estimated lesion depth.

Referring to FIGS. 19 and 20 examples of visualization utilizing contactinformation provided by the force sensing catheter to map lesions ofheart tissue are presented according to one embodiment of the invention.In various embodiments, the data acquisition and processing unit 124overlays a visualization of each contact point 300 of the force sensingcatheter on the 3D virtual model 260. In one embodiment each visualizedcontact point represents approximately 1 second of contact during anablation procedure. In another embodiment, visualizations, such as dots,are overlaid at a rate which depends on the force-time integral. In arelated embodiment, visualized dots are overlaid at a rate depending onthe force-time and power. Thus, in these embodiments areas of the 3Dvirtual model will have a higher density of visualized dots where lesionsize is believed to be more extended. In certain embodiments thisvisualized dot density will be representative of how much energy wasdelivered to a certain area of the organ. In this way, the dataacquisition and processing unit 124 can provide a graphicalrepresentation of organ tissues with highest duration and coverage ofcontact during ablation which may affect operator decisions on lesionlocation and the ablation procedure.

Referring to FIGS. 21 and 22, the visualization of force combined withcontact to map lesions of heart tissue are presented according to oneembodiment of the invention. In various embodiments, the dataacquisition and processing unit 124 overlays a visualization of eachcontact point combined with force 302 of the force sensing catheter onthe 3D virtual model 260. In one embodiment each visualized contactpoint exhibits a varying diameter based on the amount of force utilizedin the contact. For example, a contact point made using low force willhave a visualization with a small diameter whereas a contact point madeusing a large amount of force will have a large diameter. In otherembodiments, the diameter may vary with some other metric, such as theforce-time integral. In this way, the data acquisition and processingunit 124 can provide an additional graphical representation of hearttissues with highest duration, force and coverage of contact duringablation.

In another embodiment, the diameter of the lesion may be representativeof the actual area of the predicted lesion size, as predicted by theforce-time integration technique. The area may be converted to anequivalent diameter which can be scaled to give a proportionally trueestimate of the lesion diameter on the model.

In various embodiments, power may be combined with contact and force tomap lesions of heart tissues on a 3D virtual model 260. In thisembodiment, the data acquisition and processing unit 124 overlays avisualization of each contact point combined with force and power of theforce sensing catheter on the 3D virtual model 260. In one embodimenteach visualized contact point exhibits a varying diameter based on theamount of force and power utilized in the contact. In one embodiment,the visualized contact point may depict a varying amount of ovalitybased on the amount of power utilized in the contact. For example, acontact point made using low force and power will have a visualizationwith a small area and mainly circular in shape whereas a contact pointmade using a large amount of force and power will have a large diameterand be significantly oval. In other embodiments, additional visualeffects are used to represent each metric used to estimate the lesion.For example, the magnitude of time may be represented by a fill pattern,power by color and force by opacity. In this way, the data acquisitionand processing unit 124 can provide an additional graphicalrepresentation of heart tissues with highest duration, force, power andcoverage of contact during ablation.

In still another embodiment, a first metric may be represented by avarying diameter while a second metric is represented by a varying coloror darkness. For example, the magnitude of the force-time integral maybe represented by the diameter of the contact point, as depicted in FIG.11, while the power level is represented by the color or darkness of thecontact point (e.g., light gray for low power, medium gray for mediumpower and black for high power). Thus, in various embodiments eachmetric utilized in the visualization of a lesion will be represented bya different visual effect, giving the operator an indication of themagnitude of the metric at that location.

In various embodiments, the visualization of the force-contact densitycombination or the force-power-contact density combination can providethe operator with a reliable determination of tissue damage such astissue perforation 304. In these embodiments, the combination of forceor force and power at a contact point allows the data acquisition andprocessing unit 124 to characterize tissue areas subject to a highlikelihood tissue damage such as perforation. In this way, theseembodiments provide the operator with early indications of possibleprocedure complications and allow for remedial actions if necessary.Further, the use of force or force and power allows for predictabilityof tissue damage not present when utilizing only catheter contactinformation. Thus, the visualization of force or force and power todetermine tissue damage is helpful in discerning possible physicalmanifestations as a result of ablation procedures.

In other embodiments, the visualization of force combined with contactdensity or force and power combined with contact density may provide theoperator with estimates of the location of edemas or tissues resistantto the ablation procedure. In these embodiments the data acquisition andprocessing unit 124 may determine that contact, force or power wasinsufficient in lesion creation and may identify the point as an area ofpossible edema or resistance. In various embodiments these areas may bevisualized utilizing a different visual effect such as varying color,stroke or gradient.

In still other embodiments, the visualization of force combined withcontact density or force and power combined with contact density mayprovide the operator with estimates of the location of gaps in theisolation line. In these embodiments the data acquisition and processingunit 124 may determine that contact, force or power was insufficient inelectrical isolation and may identify the point as an area of a possibleisolation gap. In various embodiments these areas may be visualizedutilizing a different visual effect such as varying color, stroke orgradient.

Referring to FIG. 23 a cross-section 320 of the 3D virtual model 160 ispresented. In various embodiments, the 3D virtual model 160 may becross-sectioned to examine different views of the characterized andvisualized lesion, such as lesion depth and cross-section based on anassumed shape of the lesion volume. For example, the volume of thelesion may be assumed to be that of a hemisphere or half-ellipsoid.Given a predicted lesion depth and volume, the boundary of the lesioncross-section can be estimated. Thus, an operator may view the estimateddepth of a visualized lesion by taking a cross-section view of the 3Dvirtual model 160.

In a related embodiment, the data acquisition and processing unit 124may provide estimates of transmural lesion. Thus, a visualization of theprobability of transmural lesion may be represented using an additionalvisual effect. For example, a visual effect such as color, hue ortransparency may be used to present a visualization of the magnitude ofthe probability of transmural lesion at a location while the diameter ofthe contact point represents the magnitude of the force-time integral.

Referring to FIG. 24 a visualization user interface 340 according to oneembodiment is presented. The visualization user interface 340 may have a3D model display pane 342, a control pane 344 and an information pane346. The 3D model display pane may be manipulated using a mouse,keyboard, joystick or similar user interaction device. In this way theoperator can manipulate the 3D virtual model in the X, Y and Z planes inorder to visualize lesions in all areas of the heart. Further, the 3Dmodel display pane may be able to display cross-sectional views of hearttissue by selecting a slice operation, or zooming into the tissueutilizing zoom controls. The control pane 344 may have several optionmenus or buttons 348 in which the operator may select differentvisualization options as described herein. The control pane 346 isconfigurable and supports a modification in the placement, size andnumber of operational controls. The information pane 346 may provide theoperator with information related to the patient 350 the selectedvisualization 352. Further, the information pane may provide theoperator with information related to each visualization of a lesion 354when the operator utilizes a cursor to highlight areas of the 3D virtualmap with lesion visualizations. The information pane 346 is configurableand supports a modification in placement, size and content ofinformation presented.

Referring to FIGS. 25 and 26, methods of characterizing and visualizinglesions according to embodiments of the invention are presented. First,a 3D model of the physical organ such as a heart is created utilizingMRI, CT scan, sonogram, electrical or magnetic impulse is generated 400.The 3D virtual model of an organ is then mapped to a coordinate systemthus fusing directional coordinates with the 3D virtual model 402. Thefused 3D model is then stored in memory 404. In certain embodiments thefused 3D model is stored in an HIS 200 and linked with the patient'smedical history. In other embodiments, the fused model is utilized onlyin a data acquisition and processing unit 124 for use during theablation procedure. During the ablation procedure, the location andmeasureable variables of a contact sensitive ablation catheter arerecorded 406.

In certain embodiments, measureable variables include time, temperature,force, power, contact, electrical impedance and location. The measuredlocation of the catheter is then mapped onto the stored 3D model 408.The fused 3D model may be transferred from the HIS 200 to a dataacquisition and processing unit 124 before the procedure begins. Inother embodiments, the fused 3D model is resident in the dataacquisition and processing unit 124. Next a data acquisition andprocessing unit 124 will analyze the measured variables of the lesion atthe current catheter location 410. In certain embodiments, the dataacquisition and processing unit 124 will estimate the time-forceintegral based on the measured variables. The data acquisition andprocessing unit 124 will then calculate the parameters of the lesion atthe location. In various embodiments parameters may include area, depthor volume or any combination of the forgoing of the lesion at thelocation 412. In other embodiments, the data acquisition and processingunit 124 will also calculate visual effects to be used in thevisualization of the calculated parameters of the lesion at thelocation. The visual effects may include varying color, stroke orgradient fill effects. The data acquisition and processing unit 124 willthen render the calculated parameters of the lesion at the location onthe 3D model 414. In certain embodiments, an additional step ofcalculating the parameters of resistant tissues is performed 416. Thedata acquisition and processing unit 124 will then render the calculatedparameters of the lesion, the resistant tissue or a combination on the3D model 418. In this embodiment, the visualization of the resistivetissue will utilize a significantly different visual effect than theeffects used to visualize lesion information.

Each of the features and methods disclosed herein may be usedseparately, or in conjunction with other features and methods, toprovide improved devices, systems and methods for making and using thesame. Therefore, combinations of features and methods disclosed hereinmay not be necessary to practice the invention in its broadest sense andare instead disclosed merely to particularly describe representativeembodiments of the invention.

For purposes of interpreting the claims for the present invention, it isexpressly intended that the provisions of Section 112, sixth paragraphof 35 U.S.C. are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for”or “steps for” are recited in the subject claim.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for visualizing lesions on targettissue, the system comprising a data acquisition and processing unitconfigured to: receive signals from a force sensor of an elongatedflexible catheter comprising an ablation head, said force sensor signalsbeing in reaction to forces exerted against said ablation head by saidtarget tissue; produce a sequence of contact force values based on saidforce sensor signals acquired over a time period of energization of saidablation head; determine in real time a force-time integral based onsaid sequence of contact forces; characterize a lesion based on saidforce-time integral; and generate for display a visualizationrepresenting said characterization of said lesion.
 2. The system ofclaim 1, wherein said characterization is a size parameter of saidlesion, preferably at least one of volume, area, and depth of saidlesion.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein said data acquisition andprocessing unit is configured to determine said size parameter of saidlesion using a magnitude of an energization parameter delivered to saidablation head during said energization of said ablation head.
 4. Thesystem of claim 3, wherein said data acquisition and processing unit isconfigured to control said magnitude of said energization parameterduring said energization of said ablation head.
 5. The system of claim4, wherein said controlled magnitude of said energization parameter isselected based on the contact forces of said sequence of contact forcesto prevent or reduce incidence of steam pop.
 6. The system of claim 1,wherein the data acquisition and processing unit is configured formeasuring of magnitudes of an energization parameter delivered to saidablation head during said energization of said ablation head.
 7. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein said force-time integral is one of aforce-energization-time integral, a force-energization-time product, anda normalized force-time integral.
 8. The system of claim 1, whereinenergization of said ablation head is terminated when saidcharacterization reaches a predetermined value.
 9. The system of claim1, wherein said visualization comprises a first indicia based on saidforce-time integral and a second indicia based on energization of theablation head, wherein said first indicia and said second indicia arepreferably combined to display a visualization indicative of ablationeffectiveness.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein energization furthercomprises energizing the ablation head when a contact force exceeds adesired force level.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the dataacquisition and processing unit is configured for determining amagnitude of an ablation energization parameter delivered to theablation head during said period of energization, and wherein saidcharacterizing step further comprises characterizing the lesion based onthe force-time integral and the magnitude of the ablation energizationparameter delivered to the ablation head.
 12. The system of claim 1,wherein said visualization comprises indicia selected from the groupconsisting of shape, area, color, stroke, opacity, and fill pattern toindicate different lesion characteristics.
 13. The system of claim 1,wherein the visualization comprises a plurality of indicia, wherein afirst indicia of said plurality of indicia is based on the force-timeintegral and a second indicia of said plurality of indicia is based onablation energy.
 14. The system of claim 1, wherein said dataacquisition and processing unit is configured to overlay thevisualization of said lesion on an anatomical model or an image.
 15. Amethod of displaying a visualization representing a characteristic of alesion, the method comprising: measuring a sequence of contact forces onan elongate flexible catheter also comprising a force sensor, saidcontact forces being in reaction to forces exerted against an ablationhead of the elongated flexible catheter; controlling with a dataacquisition and processing unit an energization of the ablation head fora period of time while said sequence of contact forces is beingmeasured; determining a force-time integral based on said sequence ofcontact forces that were measured with said force sensor over saidperiod of time of energization of said ablation head, said force-timeintegral being determined in real time; characterizing the lesion basedon the force-time integral; and generating on a display thevisualization representing the characterization of the lesion.
 16. Themethod of claim 15 further comprising controlling said period of time ofenergizing said ablation head based on said force-time integral.
 17. Themethod of claim 15 further comprising estimating a size parameter ofsaid lesion based on said force-time integral, and wherein saidgenerating step further comprises using said estimated size parameter ofsaid lesion.
 18. The method of claim 15 further comprising: determininga magnitude of an energization parameter delivered to said ablation headduring said energization of said ablation head; and estimating a sizeparameter of said lesion using said magnitude of said energizationparameter.
 19. The method of claim 18 further comprising controllingsaid magnitude of said energization parameter during said energizationof said ablation head.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein saidcontrolled magnitude of said energization parameter is selected based onthe contact forces of said sequence of contact forces to prevent orreduce incidence of steam pop.
 21. The method of claim 15, wherein saidvisualization comprises indicia selected from the group consisting ofshape, area, color, opacity, and fill pattern to indicate differentlesion characteristics.